TopStep Trader vs OneUp Trader

topstepvsoneuptrader

Top Step Trader vs. One Up Trader

Today’s article is a good little piece of trader gossip. In the past couple of years, I have written various articles on the ‘hamster wheel’ known as Top Step Trader.

For those not familiar, Top Step Trader is a “fake” proprietary trading company where futures trading newbies pay hundreds of dollars each month to trade on a simulator.

Top Step Trader purports to offer funded trading accounts to whoever is lucky enough to escape the hampster wheel alive. Essentially, a trader must meet the minimum performance requirements in  something called “the combine.” If they pass “the combine” then they are awarded a token funded trading account.

I put heavy emphasis on the word token. Why use the word token? Because the funded trading account is as small as a mouse’s ballsack and is usually snatched away quicker than a hungry dog will gobble up a piece of freshly barbecued meat.

The Top Step Trader funded accounts program is the ultimate gimmick. Where the newbie and the naive with no trading account, is encouraged to use a credit card to purchase access to a trading simulator. They get caught up in a ridiculous cycle of (usually) perpetual failure. Encouraged to keep spending hundreds of dollars each month at the elusive chance at winning the prize.

TopStep Trader Combine

Can you win a funded trading account?

Yes, some folks actually are awarded a prize. The funded trading account. But in reality, the prize is about as valuable as a stuffed animal at a carnival. The truth is that masses of people throw money at this game, in hopes that the tiny little ring will somehow find the end of a bottle. And when it does, the carnival barkers at TopStep Trader send out a wave of marketing enthusiasm to highlight the lucky person. Sort of like winning the lottery. Yes, someone wins. But it won’t be you.

The Abysmal Failure Rate of Top Step Traders

How does TradingSchools.Org know the abysmal failure rate of the Top Step Trader funded trading program? TradingSchools.Org currently has about 90k monthly web visitors. That’s a lot of people. We rank page 1 for just about every single Google search term related to Top Step Trader. This puts us in a powerful position where we can tap into the mood of the audience. We can ask the audience questions about their experience with Top Step Trader.

And since we have no financial interest, unlike the hordes of affiliate marketers and trading guru’s pushing this TopStep Trader combine nonsense, we can say our true opinion.

On April 22, 2016 we published a public survey that attempted to query the ‘real’ performance statistics of people that had actually been hustled through the Top Step Trader hamster wheel. Top Step Trader does not publish any of this information (for good reason). The questions on everyone’s mind?:

  • How many people have participated by purchasing a trading combine?
  • How much money do people typically earn from funded trading accounts?
  • How long do people usually last with a funded trading account?
  • How much money is Top Step Trader making?

On June 13, 2016 we published the results of that survey.

In total, we received 163 respondents. We discovered the following:

  • The average TopStep Trader spent $1,145 in combine/hamster wheel fees.
  • 79% of participants were never able to “win” a funded trading account.
  • Those that received a funded trading account averaged -$900 in earnings. In others words, even the winners were net losers.

What was even more shocking was the estimated net profit of TopStepTrader. All survey participants had spent over $186,000 in TopStep Trader combine fees. An incredible amount.

TradingSchools.Org took a closer look at the business model and discovered that nearly all of these ‘combine’ fees were pure profit for TopStep Trader. Our internal model has the gross profits at about 90%. Truly remarkable.

How much money has TopStep Trader earned from this business model? Though it’s hard to estimate, TradingSchools.Org interviewed several of the technology vendors that provide the services that make this machine function…we estimate that TopStep Trader is earning many multiple millions of dollars each year. Not bad for a business that is basically only letting people play on a futures trading simulator.

Adults playing a video game. So quaint.

The Real Reason For The Survey

When we published the results of the survey, it would appear that the article was a classic TradingSchools.Org ‘hit-piece’. A sort of ‘consumer warning’ that people should be aware of the terrible failure rate of anyone that is stupid enough to purchase one of these ridiculous ‘trading combines’.

However, this was not the primary reason. The primary reason was to stoke competition. To highlight the incredible profit potential that additional participants could possibly reap by copying the same business model.

The business model is here to stay. It’s not going anywhere. As distasteful and crappy the deal for the consumer, it still has the potential to have incredible benefits to the retail trader.

For instance, if the pool of monies that are collected from combine fees primarily went back to the traders…then the business model could possibly bloom into something very special. This might be overly idealistic. Perhaps I still believe in the goodness of mankind.

Anyway, my ultimate hope was that additional players would enter into this business model. To offer something comparable. This was the only way to tip the scales back into alignment. More competition equals a better deal for consumers. I was hoping it would happen quickly. It didn’t.

Collectively, potential new market participants would contact me. And they would ask me, “how can this even be legal?” or “nothing this profitable can be legal.” Of which, I would reply that TopStep Trader has been running this monopoly since 2010. Surely, if the model did not pass regulatory scrutiny, then the FTC or the CFTC would have shut it down. But it simply has not happened.

Sort of like online porn. When it first arrived on the internet, collectively most people thought that the FTC would crack down. But they never did.

The First “Real” Competitor Emerges

On March 23, 2016 TradingSchools.Org posted a review about the first ‘real’ competitor to TopStep Trader. The company was named MES Capital.

Essentially, MES Capital began offering a similar opportunity as TopStep Trader. However, MES Capital was not charging any ‘combine fees’. In speaking with the founders of MES Capital, they explained that they were “just looking for some good traders that could trade their personal capital.”

MES Capital was using the exact same trading simulator as TopStep Trader. The simulator is provided by Rithmic and is commercially available to anyone willing to pay a fee. Nothing special here. An off-the-shelf piece of technology that has been in use for decades.

During the remainder of 2016, TradingSchools.Org spoke with various individuals that had been funded by MES Capital. We received no complaints from persons that were able to pass the testing parameters and received a funded trading account.

However, we did receive gripes from persons that had “traded profitably” during the testing phase, and yet were not able to receive a funded trading account. They did not understand why.

TradingSchools.Org researched the question as to why some were being funded, and some were not being funded. MES Capital did not have any published prerequisite or definable benchmark that a person must achieve in order to be awarded a funded trading account. Our best guess is that MES Capital simply ran out of funds to spread around.

Truth be told, most retail traders lose. Although the business model of not charging a testing fee seems like a generous and fair business model, in actuality, it is probably a losing endeavor.

TradingSchools.Org does not have a problem with the business model. We have a problem with how much TopStep Trader is skimming from the combine pool. A 90% profit

unquenchable greed

The unquenchable greed of TopStep Trader.

margin is fucking robbery. It’s unconscionable. This is what happens when you have a monopoly. It’s the very definition of extreme greed.

MES Capital transforms into One Up Trader

In the early part of 2017, TradingSchools.Org began to hear rumblings from insiders that MES Capital would be changing their business model. That they would begin charging a fee to individuals, similar to the TopStep Trader business model.

Although readers are probably already ‘poo-pooing’ the idea of yet another TopStep Trader business model, I actually applaud the idea. Finally, a new competitor is entering the scene. The owners of MES Captial understood their limitations and also understood the fat profit margins being earned by TopStep Trader. MES Capital rebranded their name to One Up Trader and decided to offer a better deal for consumers.

How much of a better deal? Much better. They addressed some of the most egregious practices of TopStep Trader. I won’t go into the specifics, but the business model of OneUp Trader is now attempting to offer a better deal to consumers.

In May 2017, OneUp Trader officially launched.

The reaction from Top Step Trader

How did TopStep Trader react to a new competitor? Did TopStep Trader reflect on the reasons why a new competitor entered the marketplace?

The reaction from TopStep Trader has been in my opinion vicious, ugly, petty, and vindictive. They filed a lawsuit that is attempting to bully One Up Trader into legal submission. The lawsuit is pure folly. The legal basis for the lawsuit is ripped straight from the playbook of a monopolistic bully. Trying to kill off a competitor, while it is still a baby in the crib.

Consumers should be outraged. The legal attack on One Up Trader is more than the petty argument of a couple of ‘rich guys’. Make no mistake, this is about maintaining a monopoly, about keeping a stranglehold on consumer choice. Its an attempt to bludgeon not only free and fair competition but also an attempt to keep you confined within a narrow box of lesser choices. It is outrageous. I have included a copy of the legal filing below:

TopStep Trader vs OneUp Trader

 

If you took the time to read this…essentially, TopStep Trader is arguing the following:

  • They have a registered patent for the Rithmic trading simulator. They don’t.
  • That they are the originators of the concept of using a simulator to evaluate trader performance. Total bullshit.
  • That any company offering a service, even comparatively, is an infringement of their proprietary method for ripping people off.
  • That anyone that visits the TopStep Trader website is voluntarily consenting to never be a competitor of TopStep Trader.

Imagine for a moment, you visit your local McDonalds for a hamburger. It’s a delicious hamburger. And so you go home and tell your wife that you want to open a hamburger restaurant. But you want to add an extra beef patty. You decide to name your hamburger ‘The Big Meaty’. You believe your hamburger will sell better than the Big Mac.

And so you plow your life savings into this new restaurant. About a week later, you receive a letter from a douche bag lawyer in Chicago that demands that you immediately shut down your restaurant. That you are stealing the concept of the hamburger from McDonald’s. And that since you visited McDonald’s, you inadvertently agreed to never open a competing hamburger restaurant.

Can you see the lunacy of this argument? Am I alone on this?

Wrapping this up

I have no love for either TopStep Trader, or OneUp Trader. Currently, the business model is shady as hell.

However, what if several competitors are allowed to compete within the space? Imagine if a company were to emerge that offered 75% of the simulator fee’s to be channeled back into funded trading accounts?

OneUp Trader is a good start. The business model is not going away. We need more competition.

Thanks for reading. This is a story that I would truly love to read your comments. Personally, these buttholes at TopStep Trader have really gotten under my skin. Its time that someone knocks them square in the jaw.

This is fight worth having.

TopStep Trader vs OneUp Trader

topstepvsoneuptrader

Top Step Trader vs. One Up Trader

Today’s article is a good little piece of trader gossip. In the past couple of years, I have written various articles on the ‘hamster wheel’ known as Top Step Trader.

For those not familiar, Top Step Trader is a “fake” proprietary trading company where futures trading newbies pay hundreds of dollars each month to trade on a simulator.

Top Step Trader purports to offer funded trading accounts to whoever is lucky enough to escape the hampster wheel alive. Essentially, a trader must meet the minimum performance requirements in  something called “the combine.” If they pass “the combine” then they are awarded a token funded trading account.

I put heavy emphasis on the word token. Why use the word token? Because the funded trading account is as small as a mouse’s ballsack and is usually snatched away quicker than a hungry dog will gobble up a piece of freshly barbecued meat.

The Top Step Trader funded accounts program is the ultimate gimmick. Where the newbie and the naive with no trading account, is encouraged to use a credit card to purchase access to a trading simulator. They get caught up in a ridiculous cycle of (usually) perpetual failure. Encouraged to keep spending hundreds of dollars each month at the elusive chance at winning the prize.

TopStep Trader Combine

Can you win a funded trading account?

Yes, some folks actually are awarded a prize. The funded trading account. But in reality, the prize is about as valuable as a stuffed animal at a carnival. The truth is that masses of people throw money at this game, in hopes that the tiny little ring will somehow find the end of a bottle. And when it does, the carnival barkers at TopStep Trader send out a wave of marketing enthusiasm to highlight the lucky person. Sort of like winning the lottery. Yes, someone wins. But it won’t be you.

The Abysmal Failure Rate of Top Step Traders

How does TradingSchools.Org know the abysmal failure rate of the Top Step Trader funded trading program? TradingSchools.Org currently has about 90k monthly web visitors. That’s a lot of people. We rank page 1 for just about every single Google search term related to Top Step Trader. This puts us in a powerful position where we can tap into the mood of the audience. We can ask the audience questions about their experience with Top Step Trader.

And since we have no financial interest, unlike the hordes of affiliate marketers and trading guru’s pushing this TopStep Trader combine nonsense, we can say our true opinion.

On April 22, 2016 we published a public survey that attempted to query the ‘real’ performance statistics of people that had actually been hustled through the Top Step Trader hamster wheel. Top Step Trader does not publish any of this information (for good reason). The questions on everyone’s mind?:

  • How many people have participated by purchasing a trading combine?
  • How much money do people typically earn from funded trading accounts?
  • How long do people usually last with a funded trading account?
  • How much money is Top Step Trader making?

On June 13, 2016 we published the results of that survey.

In total, we received 163 respondents. We discovered the following:

  • The average TopStep Trader spent $1,145 in combine/hamster wheel fees.
  • 79% of participants were never able to “win” a funded trading account.
  • Those that received a funded trading account averaged -$900 in earnings. In others words, even the winners were net losers.

What was even more shocking was the estimated net profit of TopStepTrader. All survey participants had spent over $186,000 in TopStep Trader combine fees. An incredible amount.

TradingSchools.Org took a closer look at the business model and discovered that nearly all of these ‘combine’ fees were pure profit for TopStep Trader. Our internal model has the gross profits at about 90%. Truly remarkable.

How much money has TopStep Trader earned from this business model? Though it’s hard to estimate, TradingSchools.Org interviewed several of the technology vendors that provide the services that make this machine function…we estimate that TopStep Trader is earning many multiple millions of dollars each year. Not bad for a business that is basically only letting people play on a futures trading simulator.

Adults playing a video game. So quaint.

The Real Reason For The Survey

When we published the results of the survey, it would appear that the article was a classic TradingSchools.Org ‘hit-piece’. A sort of ‘consumer warning’ that people should be aware of the terrible failure rate of anyone that is stupid enough to purchase one of these ridiculous ‘trading combines’.

However, this was not the primary reason. The primary reason was to stoke competition. To highlight the incredible profit potential that additional participants could possibly reap by copying the same business model.

The business model is here to stay. It’s not going anywhere. As distasteful and crappy the deal for the consumer, it still has the potential to have incredible benefits to the retail trader.

For instance, if the pool of monies that are collected from combine fees primarily went back to the traders…then the business model could possibly bloom into something very special. This might be overly idealistic. Perhaps I still believe in the goodness of mankind.

Anyway, my ultimate hope was that additional players would enter into this business model. To offer something comparable. This was the only way to tip the scales back into alignment. More competition equals a better deal for consumers. I was hoping it would happen quickly. It didn’t.

Collectively, potential new market participants would contact me. And they would ask me, “how can this even be legal?” or “nothing this profitable can be legal.” Of which, I would reply that TopStep Trader has been running this monopoly since 2010. Surely, if the model did not pass regulatory scrutiny, then the FTC or the CFTC would have shut it down. But it simply has not happened.

Sort of like online porn. When it first arrived on the internet, collectively most people thought that the FTC would crack down. But they never did.

The First “Real” Competitor Emerges

On March 23, 2016 TradingSchools.Org posted a review about the first ‘real’ competitor to TopStep Trader. The company was named MES Capital.

Essentially, MES Capital began offering a similar opportunity as TopStep Trader. However, MES Capital was not charging any ‘combine fees’. In speaking with the founders of MES Capital, they explained that they were “just looking for some good traders that could trade their personal capital.”

MES Capital was using the exact same trading simulator as TopStep Trader. The simulator is provided by Rithmic and is commercially available to anyone willing to pay a fee. Nothing special here. An off-the-shelf piece of technology that has been in use for decades.

During the remainder of 2016, TradingSchools.Org spoke with various individuals that had been funded by MES Capital. We received no complaints from persons that were able to pass the testing parameters and received a funded trading account.

However, we did receive gripes from persons that had “traded profitably” during the testing phase, and yet were not able to receive a funded trading account. They did not understand why.

TradingSchools.Org researched the question as to why some were being funded, and some were not being funded. MES Capital did not have any published prerequisite or definable benchmark that a person must achieve in order to be awarded a funded trading account. Our best guess is that MES Capital simply ran out of funds to spread around.

Truth be told, most retail traders lose. Although the business model of not charging a testing fee seems like a generous and fair business model, in actuality, it is probably a losing endeavor.

TradingSchools.Org does not have a problem with the business model. We have a problem with how much TopStep Trader is skimming from the combine pool. A 90% profit

unquenchable greed

The unquenchable greed of TopStep Trader.

margin is fucking robbery. It’s unconscionable. This is what happens when you have a monopoly. It’s the very definition of extreme greed.

MES Capital transforms into One Up Trader

In the early part of 2017, TradingSchools.Org began to hear rumblings from insiders that MES Capital would be changing their business model. That they would begin charging a fee to individuals, similar to the TopStep Trader business model.

Although readers are probably already ‘poo-pooing’ the idea of yet another TopStep Trader business model, I actually applaud the idea. Finally, a new competitor is entering the scene. The owners of MES Captial understood their limitations and also understood the fat profit margins being earned by TopStep Trader. MES Capital rebranded their name to One Up Trader and decided to offer a better deal for consumers.

How much of a better deal? Much better. They addressed some of the most egregious practices of TopStep Trader. I won’t go into the specifics, but the business model of OneUp Trader is now attempting to offer a better deal to consumers.

In May 2017, OneUp Trader officially launched.

The reaction from Top Step Trader

How did TopStep Trader react to a new competitor? Did TopStep Trader reflect on the reasons why a new competitor entered the marketplace?

The reaction from TopStep Trader has been in my opinion vicious, ugly, petty, and vindictive. They filed a lawsuit that is attempting to bully One Up Trader into legal submission. The lawsuit is pure folly. The legal basis for the lawsuit is ripped straight from the playbook of a monopolistic bully. Trying to kill off a competitor, while it is still a baby in the crib.

Consumers should be outraged. The legal attack on One Up Trader is more than the petty argument of a couple of ‘rich guys’. Make no mistake, this is about maintaining a monopoly, about keeping a stranglehold on consumer choice. Its an attempt to bludgeon not only free and fair competition but also an attempt to keep you confined within a narrow box of lesser choices. It is outrageous. I have included a copy of the legal filing below:

TopStep Trader vs OneUp Trader

 

If you took the time to read this…essentially, TopStep Trader is arguing the following:

  • They have a registered patent for the Rithmic trading simulator. They don’t.
  • That they are the originators of the concept of using a simulator to evaluate trader performance. Total bullshit.
  • That any company offering a service, even comparatively, is an infringement of their proprietary method for ripping people off.
  • That anyone that visits the TopStep Trader website is voluntarily consenting to never be a competitor of TopStep Trader.

Imagine for a moment, you visit your local McDonalds for a hamburger. It’s a delicious hamburger. And so you go home and tell your wife that you want to open a hamburger restaurant. But you want to add an extra beef patty. You decide to name your hamburger ‘The Big Meaty’. You believe your hamburger will sell better than the Big Mac.

And so you plow your life savings into this new restaurant. About a week later, you receive a letter from a douche bag lawyer in Chicago that demands that you immediately shut down your restaurant. That you are stealing the concept of the hamburger from McDonald’s. And that since you visited McDonald’s, you inadvertently agreed to never open a competing hamburger restaurant.

Can you see the lunacy of this argument? Am I alone on this?

Wrapping this up

I have no love for either TopStep Trader, or OneUp Trader. Currently, the business model is shady as hell.

However, what if several competitors are allowed to compete within the space? Imagine if a company were to emerge that offered 75% of the simulator fee’s to be channeled back into funded trading accounts?

OneUp Trader is a good start. The business model is not going away. We need more competition.

Thanks for reading. This is a story that I would truly love to read your comments. Personally, these buttholes at TopStep Trader have really gotten under my skin. Its time that someone knocks them square in the jaw.

This is fight worth having.

265 Comments

  1. Joao Santos September 28, 2021
    • Emmett Moore September 28, 2021
      • Cyndi September 30, 2021
        • Emmett Moore October 1, 2021
  2. the duke June 19, 2021
  3. Steve Vasconcellos March 12, 2020
  4. Oz Osborn February 14, 2020
    • Harry March 3, 2020
      • alex July 22, 2020
      • desertninja October 8, 2020
        • Emmett Moore October 8, 2020
    • Makusan March 8, 2021
  5. Elijah N. November 25, 2019
    • Horst April 19, 2020
  6. LizS June 4, 2019
  7. michael June 2, 2019
  8. Big ups April 11, 2019
  9. dm December 15, 2018
  10. wannabetrader October 9, 2018
  11. Trader April 5, 2018
  12. Manoj February 8, 2018
  13. trader33 December 22, 2017
    • dbtrader December 26, 2017
  14. James November 29, 2017
    • Emmett Moore November 29, 2017
    • guest January 9, 2018
    • Horst April 19, 2020
      • Emmett Moore April 19, 2020
  15. Makusan November 21, 2017
  16. jonah November 15, 2017
  17. Tyson October 12, 2017
    • Emmett Moore October 13, 2017
  18. DTrump October 1, 2017
    • GBush October 3, 2017
  19. tstrader September 21, 2017
    • Cameron October 5, 2018
  20. mickey September 21, 2017
    • Cyn September 21, 2017
  21. Scott September 1, 2017
    • Emmett Moore September 1, 2017
    • Enzo September 2, 2017
  22. BottomStepTrader August 16, 2017
  23. BottomStepTrader August 10, 2017
    • Rob B August 11, 2017
      • Cyn August 11, 2017
      • Mike M August 11, 2017
        • Rob B August 11, 2017
          • Rob B August 11, 2017
          • Mike M August 11, 2017
            • Rob B August 11, 2017
          • dtchum August 11, 2017
            • Rob B August 11, 2017
              • dtchum August 11, 2017
                • Rob B August 12, 2017
            • Emmett Moore August 11, 2017
              • Rob B August 12, 2017
              • Mike M August 12, 2017
    • Cyn August 11, 2017
  24. BottomStepTrader August 2, 2017
    • Tom August 8, 2017
  25. Fara July 29, 2017
    • dtchurn July 29, 2017
      • Stray Dog July 30, 2017
        • dtchurn July 30, 2017
          • dtchum July 30, 2017
            • dtchurn July 30, 2017
              • dtchum July 30, 2017
                • dtchurn July 30, 2017
            • dtchurn July 30, 2017
            • dtchurn July 30, 2017
              • dtchum July 30, 2017
                • Rob B July 30, 2017
                • dtchum July 31, 2017
                • Rob B July 31, 2017
                • dtchum July 31, 2017
                • Rob B July 31, 2017
                • dtchum July 31, 2017
                • Rob B July 31, 2017
      • dtchum July 30, 2017
    • Rob B July 30, 2017
    • Mike M July 30, 2017
  26. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  27. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  28. dtchum July 29, 2017
  29. dtchurn July 29, 2017
    • dtchurn July 29, 2017
  30. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  31. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  32. dtchurn July 29, 2017
    • dtchurn July 29, 2017
  33. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  34. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  35. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  36. dtchurn July 29, 2017
    • dtchurn July 29, 2017
  37. dtchurn July 29, 2017
    • dtchurn July 29, 2017
      • dtchurn July 29, 2017
        • dtchurn July 29, 2017
  38. dtchurn July 29, 2017
    • dtchurn July 29, 2017
    • Pete July 29, 2017
      • Mike M July 29, 2017
        • Rob B July 29, 2017
          • dtchurn July 29, 2017
          • Mike M July 29, 2017
        • dtchurn July 29, 2017
      • dtchurn July 29, 2017
        • dtchurn July 29, 2017
  39. dtchum July 29, 2017
    • dtchurn July 29, 2017
      • dtchum July 29, 2017
        • dtchurn July 30, 2017
    • Rob B July 29, 2017
  40. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  41. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  42. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  43. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  44. dtchurn July 29, 2017
  45. dtchum July 29, 2017
    • dtchurn July 29, 2017
      • Mike M July 29, 2017
        • dtchurn July 29, 2017
    • Rob B July 29, 2017
  46. dtchurn July 29, 2017
    • dtchurn July 29, 2017
  47. Tom July 28, 2017
  48. John Santos July 25, 2017
    • Emmett Moore July 26, 2017
      • John Santos July 26, 2017
    • Trader July 27, 2017
      • Joao July 28, 2017
  49. Cyn July 25, 2017
  50. Tom July 25, 2017
    • Emmett Moore July 25, 2017
      • Mike M July 25, 2017
    • Rob B July 25, 2017
      • Tom July 25, 2017
      • dtchurn July 25, 2017
    • Sherry July 25, 2017
      • Emmett Moore July 25, 2017
        • dtchurn July 25, 2017
          • Emmett Moore July 25, 2017
            • dtchurn July 25, 2017
              • dtchurn July 25, 2017
              • Pete July 28, 2017
                • dtchurn July 28, 2017
                • dtchurn July 28, 2017
      • Rob B July 25, 2017
        • Sherry July 25, 2017
          • James Mincell July 25, 2017
            • James Mincell July 25, 2017
            • Mike M July 25, 2017
              • James Mincell July 25, 2017
          • Rob B July 25, 2017
            • Sherry July 25, 2017
              • Mike M July 25, 2017
                • Sherry July 25, 2017
                • Rob B July 25, 2017
                • Cyn July 25, 2017
                • Mike M July 25, 2017
                • James Mincell July 25, 2017
                • Tom July 25, 2017
                • Mike M July 25, 2017
                • Rob B July 25, 2017
                • Mike M July 25, 2017
                • dtchurn July 25, 2017
              • James Mincell July 25, 2017
                • Sherry July 25, 2017
                • Sherry July 25, 2017
              • Rob B July 25, 2017
      • Emmett Moore July 25, 2017
        • Sherry July 25, 2017
          • dtchurn July 25, 2017
            • Mike M July 26, 2017
              • Rob B July 26, 2017
                • Cyn July 26, 2017
                • Rob B July 26, 2017
                • Cyn July 26, 2017
                • dtchurn July 26, 2017
            • Cyn July 26, 2017
              • Mike M July 26, 2017
              • dtchurn July 26, 2017
        • Tom July 25, 2017
          • Mike M July 27, 2017
        • Tom July 25, 2017
        • Tom July 25, 2017
      • Tom July 25, 2017
        • Rob B July 25, 2017
          • Tom July 25, 2017
    • Sherry July 25, 2017
  51. dtchurn July 25, 2017
    • Pete July 25, 2017
      • dtchurn July 25, 2017
        • Pete July 26, 2017
          • dtchurn July 26, 2017
            • dtchurn July 26, 2017
              • Pete July 27, 2017
                • dtchurn July 27, 2017
                • Pete July 27, 2017
                • dtchurn July 27, 2017
                • dtchum July 27, 2017
                • Rob B July 27, 2017
                • dtchum July 27, 2017
                • James Mincell July 27, 2017
                • dtchurn July 27, 2017
                • dtchurn July 28, 2017
                • dtchurn July 27, 2017
                • Rob B July 27, 2017
                • dtchurn July 27, 2017
                • dtchurn July 27, 2017
                • dtchum July 28, 2017
                • Rob B July 28, 2017
                • Mike M July 28, 2017
                • dtchum July 28, 2017
                • Rob B July 28, 2017
                • dtchurn July 28, 2017
                • dtchurn July 28, 2017
                • Pete July 28, 2017
                • Mike M July 28, 2017
                • Pete July 28, 2017
                • Mike M July 28, 2017
                • Pete July 28, 2017
                • dtchurn July 29, 2017
                • dtchurn July 28, 2017
                • dtchurn July 29, 2017
                • Pete July 29, 2017
                • dtchurn July 29, 2017
                • Pete July 29, 2017
                • dtchurn July 29, 2017
                • dtchurn July 29, 2017
                • Rob B July 29, 2017
                • Mike M July 29, 2017
                • Pete July 29, 2017
                • Mike M July 29, 2017
                • dtchurn July 29, 2017
                • dtchurn July 29, 2017
                • dtchurn July 30, 2017
                • Mike M July 29, 2017
                • dtchurn July 29, 2017
                • dtchurn July 29, 2017
                • dtchurn July 30, 2017
                • dtchurn July 29, 2017
                • dtchurn July 27, 2017
                • dtchurn July 27, 2017
                • dtchurn July 27, 2017
                • dtchurn July 27, 2017
                • dtchurn July 27, 2017
          • dtchurn July 26, 2017
      • dtchurn July 25, 2017
  52. Mike M July 25, 2017
    • Rob B July 25, 2017
      • Mike M July 25, 2017
  53. Rob B July 25, 2017
    • Emmett Moore July 25, 2017
    • Brad August 7, 2017
  54. M.G. July 25, 2017

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.